Head-to-head comparison

Glasgow vs Southampton

Full head-to-head breakdown

Add your passport to see the visa-free stay each city allows.

Your passport — optional

Adds your visa-free stay days to the visa rows in the table below.

Matchup

Glasgow vs Southampton

Full score breakdown below

Compare other cities

Nomad Scores

Head-to-head
Glasgow

United Kingdom

#83 of 104 in the dataset

Southampton

United Kingdom

#84 of 104 in the dataset

Nomad Score73/10073/100
Cost of living7 metrics
Monthly cost$2,446$2,696
Monthly cost (couple)$1,785$1,857
1BR centre$1,317$1,521
1BR outside centre$1,035$1,197
Inexpensive meal$22.60$26.59
Cappuccino$4.79$5.22
Monthly cost (family)$4,123$4,291
Internet2 metrics
Fiber
293 Mbps152 Mbps17 ms
323 Mbps207 Mbps12 ms
Mobile (4G/5G)
170 Mbps25 Mbps38 ms
143 Mbps21 Mbps35 ms
Quality of life7 metrics
Safety5.5/104.7/10
Climate index8589
Healthcare7878
Pollution index3349
Purchasing power124116
Quality of life index188166
Commute time28 min32 min
Visa & entry2 metrics
Nomad visa stay
Visa-free stay (your passport)

Glasgow vs Southampton at a glance

Nomad Scores — add your passport in the tool above to see your visa-free stay in each city.

Nomad Score

Glasgow73/100

Southampton73/100

Monthly cost (solo)

Glasgow$1,130

Southampton$1,176

Cost of living (incl. 1BR)

Glasgow$2,446

Southampton$2,696

Fiber download

Glasgow293 Mbps

Southampton323 Mbps

Glasgow vs Southampton: which is better for digital nomads?

Glasgow takes this matchup with a Nomad Score of 73/100 against 73/100 for Southampton — a 0-point lead. Affordability carries 35% of that score, connectivity 25%, climate and safety 15% each, and visa freedom the remaining 10% — a weighting built for remote workers, not tourists.

Climate tilts one way: Glasgow posts 85 on the climate index and Southampton 89.

Neither city will leave you offline: 293 Mbps fixed in Glasgow and 323 Mbps in Southampton, with 17 ms and 12 ms latency. Southampton posts the higher number, which matters for video calls, big uploads and multi-person households.

For peace of mind, Glasgow scores 5.5/10 on safety versus 4.7/10 in Southampton, with healthcare access also higher in Glasgow (index 78 vs 78).

Day-to-day expenses separate the two. Glasgow comes to about $1,130 a month for a solo nomad, Southampton to $1,176. With centre rents at $1,317 and $1,521, the full bill runs $2,446 in Glasgow and $2,696 in Southampton — a 9% difference that favors Glasgow.

Bottom line. With safety the widest split (5.5/10 vs 4.7/10), Glasgow is the safer landing spot — weigh the rest against that.

Glasgow vs Southampton — FAQ

+Is Glasgow or Southampton cheaper to live in?

Glasgow costs about $2,446 a month for a solo digital nomad ($1,130 spending plus $1,317 for a 1BR in the centre). Southampton comes to $2,696 ($1,176 plus $1,521 for rent). Glasgow is the cheaper base, about 9% less.

+How much does a couple spend in Glasgow vs Southampton?

For two people sharing, monthly costs run about $1,785 in Glasgow and $1,857 in Southampton.

+Which city has a higher Nomad Score, Glasgow or Southampton?

Glasgow tops the pair at 73/100 versus 73/100. Five weighted inputs produce that number: affordability 35%, internet 25%, climate 15%, safety 15% and visa freedom 10%.

+Which city has faster internet for remote work?

Southampton has the faster fixed connection at 323 Mbps versus 293 Mbps, with 17 ms vs 12 ms latency.

+Is Glasgow or Southampton safer for digital nomads?

Glasgow scores 5.5/10 for safety versus 4.7/10 in Southampton.

Keep comparing

More head-to-heads featuring Glasgow and Southampton.