Head-to-head comparison

Fort Worth vs Sacramento

Full head-to-head breakdown

Add your passport to see the visa-free stay each city allows.

Your passport — optional

Adds your visa-free stay days to the visa rows in the table below.

Matchup

Fort Worth vs Sacramento

Full score breakdown below

Compare other cities

Nomad Scores

Head-to-head
Fort Worth

United States of America

#48 of 104 in the dataset

Sacramento

United States of America

#50 of 104 in the dataset

Nomad Score79/10079/100
Cost of living7 metrics
Monthly cost$2,867$3,191
Monthly cost (couple)$1,914$1,745
1BR centre$1,655$2,087
1BR outside centre$1,313$1,541
Inexpensive meal$15.00$20.00
Cappuccino$6.25$5.21
Monthly cost (family)$4,422$4,030
Internet2 metrics
Fiber
416 Mbps274 Mbps11 ms
369 Mbps184 Mbps13 ms
Mobile (4G/5G)
221 Mbps25 Mbps24 ms
341 Mbps30 Mbps23 ms
Quality of life7 metrics
Safety5.7/105.1/10
Climate index8291
Healthcare6467
Pollution index5347
Purchasing power150139
Quality of life index181181
Commute time27 min27 min
Visa & entry2 metrics
Nomad visa stay
Visa-free stay (your passport)

Fort Worth vs Sacramento at a glance

Nomad Scores — add your passport in the tool above to see your visa-free stay in each city.

Nomad Score

Fort Worth79/100

Sacramento79/100

Monthly cost (solo)

Fort Worth$1,212

Sacramento$1,104

Cost of living (incl. 1BR)

Fort Worth$2,867

Sacramento$3,191

Fiber download

Fort Worth416 Mbps

Sacramento369 Mbps

Fort Worth vs Sacramento: which is better for digital nomads?

Comparing the pair head-to-head, Fort Worth edges ahead at 79/100 vs 79/100 (a 0-point gap). The index behind it blends cost, connectivity, climate, safety and visas, with affordability the largest slice at 35%.

If your mood follows the thermometer, Sacramento has the steadier climate: 82 (Fort Worth) vs 91 (Sacramento) on the climate index.

Connectivity holds up on both sides. Fixed fiber averages 416 Mbps in Fort Worth and 369 Mbps in Sacramento at 11 ms and 13 ms latency. Fort Worth wins on raw speed, while mobile downloads run 221 Mbps and 341 Mbps for working away from the flat.

Safety-wise, Fort Worth leads at 5.7/10, ahead of Sacramento (5.1/10). The healthcare index runs 64/67 the same way.

The price tags tell the story fast: $1,212 per month as a single in Fort Worth against $1,104 in Sacramento, with 1BR centre rents of $1,655 and $2,087. Including rent, Fort Worth works out to $2,867 versus $3,191 — a 10% saving.

Bottom line. If your workday is calls and uploads, Fort Worth's 416 Mbps lead over Sacramento is the figure that matters; the rest of the lineup is close.

Fort Worth vs Sacramento — FAQ

+Is Fort Worth or Sacramento cheaper to live in?

Fort Worth costs about $2,867 a month for a solo digital nomad ($1,212 spending plus $1,655 for a 1BR in the centre). Sacramento comes to $3,191 ($1,104 plus $2,087 for rent). Fort Worth is the cheaper base, about 10% less.

+How much does a couple spend in Fort Worth vs Sacramento?

For two people sharing, monthly costs run about $1,914 in Fort Worth and $1,745 in Sacramento.

+Which city has a higher Nomad Score, Fort Worth or Sacramento?

Fort Worth leads with 79/100 versus 79/100 for Sacramento — a 0-point gap. The score weighs affordability 35%, internet 25%, climate 15%, safety 15% and visa freedom 10%.

+Which city has faster internet for remote work?

Fort Worth has the faster fixed connection at 416 Mbps versus 369 Mbps, with 11 ms vs 13 ms latency.

+Is Fort Worth or Sacramento safer for digital nomads?

Fort Worth scores 5.7/10 for safety versus 5.1/10 in Sacramento.

Keep comparing

More head-to-heads featuring Fort Worth and Sacramento.