Head-to-head comparison

Birmingham vs Philadelphia

Full head-to-head breakdown

Add your passport to see the visa-free stay each city allows.

Your passport — optional

Adds your visa-free stay days to the visa rows in the table below.

Matchup

Birmingham vs Philadelphia

Full score breakdown below

Compare other cities

Nomad Scores

Head-to-head
Birmingham

United Kingdom

#92 of 104 in the dataset

Philadelphia

United States of America

#98 of 104 in the dataset

Nomad Score70/10069/100
Cost of living7 metrics
Monthly cost$2,598$3,110
Monthly cost (couple)$1,872$1,799
1BR centre$1,414$1,971
1BR outside centre$1,119$1,314
Inexpensive meal$20.86$21.50
Cappuccino$5.28$5.24
Monthly cost (family)$4,323$4,156
Internet2 metrics
Fiber
329 Mbps128 Mbps15 ms
334 Mbps144 Mbps12 ms
Mobile (4G/5G)
170 Mbps23 Mbps31 ms
485 Mbps59 Mbps25 ms
Quality of life7 metrics
Safety3.6/103.5/10
Climate index8878
Healthcare7171
Pollution index5147
Purchasing power157141
Quality of life index175166
Commute time33 min40 min
Visa & entry2 metrics
Nomad visa stay
Visa-free stay (your passport)

Birmingham vs Philadelphia at a glance

Nomad Scores — add your passport in the tool above to see your visa-free stay in each city.

Nomad Score

Birmingham70/100

Philadelphia69/100

Monthly cost (solo)

Birmingham$1,185

Philadelphia$1,139

Cost of living (incl. 1BR)

Birmingham$2,598

Philadelphia$3,110

Fiber download

Birmingham329 Mbps

Philadelphia334 Mbps

Birmingham vs Philadelphia: which is better for digital nomads?

Birmingham takes this matchup with a Nomad Score of 70/100 against 69/100 for Philadelphia — a 1-point lead. Affordability carries 35% of that score, connectivity 25%, climate and safety 15% each, and visa freedom the remaining 10% — a weighting built for remote workers, not tourists.

Safety divides them more than connectivity does: Birmingham (3.6/10) against Philadelphia (3.5/10).

Neither city will leave you offline: 329 Mbps fixed in Birmingham and 334 Mbps in Philadelphia, with 15 ms and 12 ms latency. Philadelphia posts the higher number, which matters for video calls, big uploads and multi-person households.

Birmingham is the budget-lean option. A solo nomad budgets about $1,185 a month in Birmingham versus $1,139 in Philadelphia; a 1BR in the centre runs $1,414 against $1,971. All in, living costs land at $2,598 and $3,110 respectively — roughly 16% apart, in Birmingham's favor.

If your mood follows the thermometer, Birmingham has the steadier climate: 88 (Birmingham) vs 78 (Philadelphia) on the climate index.

Bottom line. There is no runaway winner across every dimension, so the right call comes down to whether you weight budget, safety or connectivity highest — plug your own priorities and passport into the tool above.

Birmingham vs Philadelphia — FAQ

+Is Birmingham or Philadelphia cheaper to live in?

Birmingham costs about $2,598 a month for a solo digital nomad ($1,185 spending plus $1,414 for a 1BR in the centre). Philadelphia comes to $3,110 ($1,139 plus $1,971 for rent). Birmingham is the cheaper base, about 16% less.

+How much does a couple spend in Birmingham vs Philadelphia?

For two people sharing, monthly costs run about $1,872 in Birmingham and $1,799 in Philadelphia.

+Which city has a higher Nomad Score, Birmingham or Philadelphia?

Birmingham is ahead with 70/100, against 69/100 for Philadelphia (a 1-point margin). Affordability is the heaviest pillar at 35%, followed by connectivity (25%), climate and safety (15% each) and visa freedom (10%).

+Which city has faster internet for remote work?

Philadelphia has the faster fixed connection at 334 Mbps versus 329 Mbps, with 15 ms vs 12 ms latency.

+Is Birmingham or Philadelphia safer for digital nomads?

Birmingham scores 3.6/10 for safety versus 3.5/10 in Philadelphia.

Keep comparing

More head-to-heads featuring Birmingham and Philadelphia.